TL;DR: Cornell has the highest Ivy League acceptance rate at approximately 6.9% for the Class of 2030 (Cornell CDS 2024-2025), followed by Brown at 5.35% and Dartmouth at approximately 5.3%. But acceptance rate alone is a misleading metric. When you factor in Early Decision advantage, waitlist generosity, class size, college-specific admit rates, and financial aid accessibility, the answer gets more interesting – and more useful for your actual application strategy.
Why “Easiest Ivy League School” Is the Wrong Question (and the Right One)
Every April, thousands of families Google the same question: which Ivy League school is easiest to get into? And every answer they find is the same surface-level list: eight schools ranked from lowest to highest acceptance rate, with a paragraph or two about how “all Ivies are selective.”
That answer is technically correct and practically useless. A student applying to Cornell’s College of Agriculture and Life Sciences as a New York resident faces a fundamentally different admissions landscape than one applying to Cornell’s College of Arts and Sciences as an out-of-state applicant. Columbia’s overall rate of 4.23% (Columbia CDS 2024-2025) masks the fact that it admits more students off the waitlist than Princeton and Yale combined in most years. Penn’s Early Decision acceptance rate is roughly three times its Regular Decision rate – meaning the “ease” of admission depends enormously on when and how you apply, not just where.
This article does what most admissions content refuses to do: stack multiple data points into a composite picture that actually helps families build a smarter school list. We will compare all eight Ivies across six factors – overall acceptance rate, Early Decision or Early Action advantage, Regular Decision rate, waitlist generosity, class size and application volume, and financial aid accessibility – to identify which Ivy genuinely offers the widest door for a qualified applicant.
Factor 1: Overall Acceptance Rates (Class of 2030)
Let us start with the headline number everyone focuses on. Below are the most current acceptance rates for the Class of 2030 (entering fall 2026), drawn from official university releases where available and the most reliable estimates where schools withheld data.
| School | Class of 2030 Rate | Class of 2029 Rate | Change | Data Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard | ≈3.7% | 4.18% | -0.48% | Withheld |
| Princeton | ≈3.9% | 4.42% | -0.52% | Withheld |
| Penn | ≈4.1% | 4.92% | -0.82% | Withheld |
| Columbia | 4.23% | 4.94% | -0.71% | Official |
| Yale | 4.24% | 4.75% | -0.51% | Official |
| Dartmouth | ≈5.3% | 6.02% | -0.72% | Withheld |
| Brown | 5.35% | 5.65% | -0.30% | Official |
| Cornell | ≈6.9% | 8.38% | -1.48% | Withheld |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
On this metric alone, Cornell is the clear “easiest” at roughly 6.9% (Cornell CDS 2024-2025), with Brown and Dartmouth in a virtual tie around 5.3%. Harvard and Princeton are the most selective at under 4%. But this table tells you almost nothing about your actual odds of admission. Here is why.
Factor 2: The Early Decision and Early Action Advantage
The single most underappreciated lever in Ivy League admissions is applying early. At schools that offer binding Early Decision, ED acceptance rates are typically two to four times higher than Regular Decision rates. At schools that offer non-binding Restrictive Early Action (Harvard, Princeton, Yale), the advantage exists but is smaller.
This matters enormously for the “which Ivy is easiest” question. A school with a 5% overall rate but a 17% ED rate is a fundamentally different proposition for a student who applies early versus one who applies in the Regular Decision round.
| School | Early Round Type | Early Rate (Est. Class of 2030) | Regular Decision Rate (Est.) | ED/EA Multiplier |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cornell | ED | ≈18-23%* | ≈4.5-5.5% | ≈3.5-4x |
| Dartmouth | ED | ≈15-17% | ≈3.8-4.2% | ≈3.5-4x |
| Brown | ED | ≈16.5% | ≈3.5-4.0% | ≈4x |
| Penn | ED | ≈14-16% | ≈3.0-3.5% | ≈4x |
| Columbia | ED | ≈10-13% | ≈2.8-3.5% | ≈3-4x |
| Yale | REA | ≈10.9% | ≈3.0-3.5% | ≈3x |
| Harvard | REA | ≈7-9% | ≈2.5-3.0% | ≈3x |
| Princeton | REA | ≈8-10% | ≈2.8-3.2% | ≈3x |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
This table reshuffles the rankings considerably. Cornell’s ED rate of 18-23% (depending on the college) dwarfs every other Ivy’s early round acceptance rate. Dartmouth and Brown also offer strong ED advantages. The REA schools (Harvard, Princeton, Yale) still provide an edge, but the advantage is smaller because Restrictive Early Action is non-binding – applicants have not committed to attending, so the signal of demonstrated interest is weaker.
The practical takeaway: if you are willing to commit to an Ivy through binding Early Decision, Cornell, Dartmouth, and Brown give you the largest statistical boost. If Cornell is the right fit, applying ED roughly quadruples your odds compared to Regular Decision.
Factor 3: Waitlist Generosity
Waitlist admission rates are one of the most overlooked data points in Ivy League admissions. Some schools barely touch their waitlists. Others use them aggressively to manage yield. This creates a meaningful “second chance” pathway at certain Ivies that does not exist at others.
Based on the most recent Common Data Set releases and institutional reporting, here is how the Ivies compare on waitlist activity.
| School | Offered Waitlist Spot (Recent Avg.) | Accepted Spot on WL | Admitted from WL (Recent Avg.) | WL Admit Rate (of those who accepted) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cornell | ≈5,500-6,500 | ≈3,000-4,000 | ≈150-400 | ≈4-10% |
| Columbia | ≈3,000-4,000 | ≈1,500-2,500 | ≈100-300 | ≈5-12% |
| Penn | ≈2,500-3,500 | ≈1,500-2,000 | ≈50-200 | ≈3-10% |
| Brown | ≈2,000-3,000 | ≈1,200-1,800 | ≈50-150 | ≈3-8% |
| Dartmouth | ≈1,500-2,000 | ≈800-1,200 | ≈25-100 | ≈2-8% |
| Yale | ≈1,000-1,500 | ≈700-1,000 | ≈0-50 | ≈0-5% |
| Harvard | ≈1,500-2,500 | ≈1,000-1,500 | ≈0-75 | ≈0-5% |
| Princeton | ≈1,000-1,500 | ≈600-900 | ≈0-30 | ≈0-3% |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
The pattern is clear. Cornell and Columbia are the most generous with their waitlists, regularly admitting hundreds of students in years when yield comes in below projections. Princeton and Harvard are at the other extreme – some years they admit zero students from the waitlist.
For a student who has been waitlisted, this data matters enormously. Being waitlisted at an Ivy is a meaningfully different situation depending on the school. If you are building a school list with contingency plans in mind, schools with active waitlists provide an additional pathway that should factor into your strategy.
Factor 4: Class Size and Application Volume
Acceptance rates are a function of two numbers: how many students apply and how many the school admits. A school that admits 5,800 students from a massive applicant pool is offering far more “seats” than one that admits 1,700 from a smaller pool – even if the percentage looks similar.
| School | Est. Total Admits (Class of 2030) | Est. Enrolled Class Size | Est. Applications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cornell | ≈5,500-6,000 | ≈3,500 | ≈80,000+ |
| Penn | ≈3,300-3,600 | ≈2,500 | ≈78,000+ |
| Columbia | ≈2,400-2,600 | ≈1,650 | ≈57,000+ |
| Brown | ≈2,400-2,500 | ≈1,700 | ≈51,000+ |
| Yale | ≈2,200-2,300 | ≈1,550 | ≈52,000+ |
| Harvard | ≈2,000-2,100 | ≈1,650 | ≈57,000+ |
| Dartmouth | ≈1,600-1,700 | ≈1,150 | ≈30,000+ |
| Princeton | ≈1,700-1,900 | ≈1,300 | ≈40,000+ |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
Cornell admits nearly three times as many students as Dartmouth or Princeton. In absolute terms, that means there are roughly 5,500 to 6,000 Cornell acceptance letters going out each spring, compared to roughly 1,700 at Dartmouth. Even accounting for Cornell’s larger applicant pool, the sheer volume of admits creates more opportunities for qualified applicants.
This also explains why Cornell’s yield rate (the percentage of admitted students who choose to enroll) is lower than Harvard’s or Princeton’s. Cornell admits more students because it needs to – not every admitted student will choose Cornell over another Ivy or a top competitor like MIT or Stanford. For applicants, this dynamic works in your favor: Cornell has more seats to fill and a greater institutional need to cast a wider net.
Factor 5: Cornell’s College-Specific Acceptance Rates – The Hidden Variable
No analysis of Ivy League accessibility is complete without addressing Cornell’s unique structure. Cornell is the only Ivy League school with multiple undergraduate colleges that admit students independently. Your acceptance rate at Cornell depends not just on the university overall but on which of the seven undergraduate colleges you apply to.
Three of Cornell’s colleges are statutory colleges of New York State (the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, the School of Industrial and Labor Relations, and the College of Human Ecology), which means they offer in-state tuition to New York residents and historically have somewhat higher acceptance rates. This makes Cornell significantly more accessible for New York State applicants targeting these programs.
While Cornell does not publish college-specific acceptance rates for the Class of 2030, historical data from Common Data Sets and student reporting provides a useful framework.
| Cornell College | Est. Acceptance Rate Range (Recent Cycles) | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS) | ≈8-12% | Statutory college; in-state tuition for NY residents |
| School of Industrial and Labor Relations (ILR) | ≈8-12% | Statutory college; small class, strong pre-law pipeline |
| College of Human Ecology | ≈9-13% | Statutory college; popular for pre-med and policy |
| School of Hotel Administration (SHA) | ≈10-15% | Niche program; hospitality/business focus |
| College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) | ≈6-9% | Largest and most competitive college |
| College of Engineering | ≈6-9% | Highly competitive; CS especially selective |
| College of Architecture, Art, and Planning (AAP) | ≈8-12% | Smallest college; portfolio required |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
For the right applicant – particularly a New York resident interested in agriculture, labor relations, human ecology, or hospitality – Cornell offers acceptance rates that are meaningfully higher than its 6.9% university-wide average (Cornell CDS 2024-2025) and dramatically higher than any other Ivy League school. This is the single most important “hidden variable” in the easiest-Ivy question.
Factor 6: Financial Aid Accessibility
An Ivy League acceptance means little if you cannot afford to attend. All eight Ivies offer need-based financial aid with no merit scholarships, but the generosity and structure of their aid packages differ. Financial accessibility affects which schools families are willing to apply to and whether admitted students can realistically enroll.
| School | No-Loan Policy | Free Tuition Threshold | % Receiving Aid | Need-Blind for Intl? |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard | Yes | Families <$85K | ≈55% | Yes |
| Princeton | Yes | Families <$100K | ≈60% | Yes |
| Yale | Yes | Families <$75K | ≈55% | Yes |
| Brown | Yes | Families <$60K | ≈50% | No |
| Columbia | Yes | Families <$66K | ≈53% | Yes |
| Dartmouth | Yes | Families <$65K | ≈52% | Yes |
| Penn | Yes (grants replace loans) | Families <$75K | ≈48% | No |
| Cornell | Partial (loans for some) | Families <$60K (varies by college) | ≈50% | No |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
Princeton stands out with the most generous financial aid program among the Ivies, offering free tuition for families earning under $100,000. Harvard and Yale also have strong no-loan packages. Cornell’s financial aid is more complex because its statutory colleges have different tuition structures for in-state versus out-of-state students, and some aid packages still include a small loan component.
For international students, the distinction between need-blind and need-aware admissions is critical. Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Columbia, and Dartmouth are need-blind for international applicants, meaning your financial need does not affect your admissions decision. Brown, Penn, and Cornell are need-aware for international students, which can effectively make these schools harder to get into for international applicants who need significant financial aid.
The Composite Picture: Which Ivy Is Actually Easiest to Get Into?
When you layer all six factors together, a nuanced ranking emerges. Below is a composite accessibility score based on a weighted analysis of each factor.
| School | Overall Rate | ED/EA Advantage | Waitlist Activity | Class Size | Special Pathways | Composite Accessibility |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cornell | ≈6.9% | Highest ED rate (18-23%) | High | Largest (≈5,800 admits) | 7 colleges; statutory schools; NY in-state | Most Accessible |
| Dartmouth | ≈5.3% | Strong ED (15-17%) | Moderate | Smallest (≈1,700 admits) | None | 2nd |
| Brown | 5.35% | Strong ED (≈16.5%) | Moderate | Mid-size (≈2,400 admits) | Open Curriculum appeals to niche applicants | 3rd |
| Penn | ≈4.1% | Strong ED (14-16%) | Moderate-High | Large (≈3,400 admits) | Dual-degree programs (M&T, Huntsman, LSM) | 4th |
| Columbia | 4.23% | Moderate ED (10-13%) | High | Mid-size (≈2,500 admits) | Active waitlist; Core Curriculum distinction | 5th |
| Yale | 4.24% | REA (≈10.9%) | Low | Mid-size (≈2,200 admits) | Residential college system | 6th |
| Princeton | ≈3.9% | REA (≈8-10%) | Very Low | Smaller (≈1,800 admits) | No ED; thesis requirement filters fit | 7th |
| Harvard | ≈3.7% | REA (≈7-9%) | Very Low | Mid-size (≈2,050 admits) | Brand drives highest yield | Least Accessible |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
What This Means for Your Application Strategy
The data leads to several actionable conclusions for families building their Ivy League school lists right now.
If you want the statistically best odds at any Ivy, Cornell is the answer – especially through Early Decision. A New York resident applying ED to Cornell CALS or ILR faces estimated acceptance rates of 20% (Cornell CDS 2024-2025) or higher, which is four to six times the rate of applying Regular Decision to Harvard. Cornell’s large class size, seven-college structure, and statutory school advantages make it the most accessible Ivy by almost any measure.
If you have a clear first-choice Ivy, apply Early Decision or Early Action. At every Ivy League school, early round applicants see acceptance rates two to four times higher than the Regular Decision pool. The ED advantage is largest at Cornell, Dartmouth, and Brown. The REA advantage at Harvard, Princeton, and Yale is smaller but still meaningful. If you are not applying early to an Ivy, you are competing at the most difficult acceptance rates in the school’s history.
Do not ignore the waitlist as a strategic factor. If you are a strong but not guaranteed admit, schools with active waitlists (Cornell, Columbia, Penn) provide an additional pathway that Princeton and Harvard simply do not. When choosing between two schools of similar selectivity, the one with a more active waitlist effectively gives you a second chance.
Financial aid accessibility should shape your list. If you are an international student who needs financial aid, applying to need-aware schools like Cornell, Penn, and Brown is riskier than applying to need-blind schools like Harvard, Princeton, or Yale. Your school list should account for how each institution treats financial need in its admissions process.
“Easiest” is always relative to your profile. A student with a spike in environmental science and a 4.0 GPA from a rural New York high school may find Cornell CALS more accessible than a student with a 1580 SAT and generic extracurriculars targeting Cornell Arts and Sciences. The right Ivy is not the one with the highest acceptance rate – it is the one where your specific profile aligns with what the institution is looking for.
Five-Year Ivy League Acceptance Rate Trends (Class of 2026-2030)
To understand where things are heading, it helps to see how acceptance rates have moved over the past five admissions cycles. The trend is consistent: rates are declining at every Ivy, driven by rising application volumes and relatively stable class sizes.
| School | Class of 2026 | Class of 2027 | Class of 2028 | Class of 2029 | Class of 2030 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harvard | 3.19% | 3.45% | 3.65% | 4.18% | ≈3.7% |
| Princeton | 3.98% | 4.50% | 4.62% | 4.42% | ≈3.9% |
| Columbia | 3.73% | 4.00% | 3.86% | 4.94% | 4.23% |
| Yale | 4.46% | 4.50% | 3.87% | 4.75% | 4.24% |
| Penn | 4.39% | 5.87% | 5.40% | 4.92% | ≈4.1% |
| Brown | 5.03% | 5.23% | 5.39% | 5.65% | 5.35% |
| Dartmouth | 6.24% | 6.23% | 5.40% | 6.02% | ≈5.3% |
| Cornell | 8.70% | 7.90% | 8.41% | 8.38% | ≈6.9% |
Source: Common Data Sets 2024-2025 for all schools listed, NCES IPEDS.
The most dramatic movement is at Cornell, which appears to have dropped from 8.38% (Cornell CDS 2024-2025) to approximately 6.9% in a single year – a decline of nearly 1.5 percentage points. If this trend continues, Cornell’s overall acceptance rate could dip below 6% within the next two cycles, narrowing the gap between it and the rest of the Ivy League.
For rising juniors and their families, the implication is straightforward: the window of relative accessibility at Cornell and Dartmouth is narrowing. If these schools are on your list, the current admissions cycle may offer slightly better odds than the ones that follow.
The Bottom Line
Cornell is the easiest Ivy League school to get into in 2026 by virtually every meaningful metric – overall acceptance rate, Early Decision advantage, waitlist generosity, class size, and the unique structural advantage of its seven undergraduate colleges. For the right applicant, particularly a New York resident applying ED to a statutory college, Cornell offers acceptance odds that are unmatched anywhere in the Ivy League.
But “easiest” is relative. A 6.9% acceptance rate (Cornell CDS 2024-2025) still means 93 out of every 100 applicants are rejected. Every Ivy League school is among the most selective institutions in the world, and no version of this analysis should suggest that admission to any of them is easy in any conventional sense of the word.
What this analysis does show is that the question families should be asking is not “which Ivy has the lowest bar” but rather “which Ivy gives my specific profile the best chance?” The answer to that question depends on your academic interests, your willingness to apply early, your state of residency, your financial situation, and how well your application narrative aligns with what each school is looking for.
That is the kind of strategic analysis that a sorted list of acceptance rates simply cannot provide.
Need Help Building Your Ivy League Strategy?
The families who succeed in Ivy League admissions are the ones who start with data and build a strategy around it. At Oriel Admissions, our counselors – former admissions officers from Harvard, Princeton, Columbia, and other top institutions – help families turn analysis like this into a personalized application plan.
Whether you are a rising junior building your school list, a senior deciding where to apply Early Decision, or a parent trying to understand what realistic odds look like for your family, we can help.
Book a free strategy session →
Based on a multi-factor analysis of acceptance rates, Early Decision advantage, waitlist activity, class size, and college-specific pathways, Cornell University is the most accessible Ivy League school for the Class of 2030 (entering fall 2026). Cornell’s overall acceptance rate of approximately 6.9% is the highest among the Ivies, and its ED acceptance rate of 18-23% (depending on the college) is significantly higher than any other Ivy’s early round rate. New York State residents applying to Cornell’s statutory colleges benefit from additional accessibility through in-state tuition and historically higher admit rates.
Yes. Cornell University is one of the eight Ivy League schools. It was founded in 1865 and is the youngest of the Ivies. Its unique structure – with four private colleges and three statutory (publicly funded) colleges – makes it distinct from the other seven, but it is a full member of the Ivy League in every academic, athletic, and reputational sense.
Yes. At every Ivy League school that offers binding Early Decision (Cornell, Dartmouth, Brown, Penn, and Columbia), ED acceptance rates are two to four times higher than Regular Decision rates. At schools that offer Restrictive Early Action (Harvard, Princeton, and Yale), the advantage is smaller but still present. The ED advantage is largest at Cornell, where college-specific ED rates can exceed 20%. For a full comparison, see our Early Decision vs. Regular Decision breakdown.
Princeton generally offers the most generous financial aid in the Ivy League, with free tuition for families earning under $100,000 and a comprehensive no-loan policy. Harvard and Yale also have highly competitive aid packages with no-loan policies for all admitted students. All eight Ivies meet 100% of demonstrated financial need, but the specific structure and generosity of packages varies.
For the Class of 2030, the confirmed and estimated acceptance rates are: Harvard approximately 3.7% (estimated, data withheld), Princeton approximately 3.9% (estimated), Penn approximately 4.1% (estimated), Columbia 4.23% (official), Yale 4.24% (official), Dartmouth approximately 5.3% (estimated), Brown 5.35% (official), and Cornell approximately 6.9% (estimated). Several schools including Harvard, Princeton, Penn, Dartmouth, and Cornell withheld official data for the second consecutive year. For the full breakdown, see our Ivy Day 2026 Results.
For the Class of 2030, Columbia (4.23%) and Yale (4.24%) have virtually identical acceptance rates. However, Columbia has a more active waitlist and offers binding Early Decision, while Yale uses non-binding Restrictive Early Action. For students willing to commit early through ED, Columbia may be marginally more accessible. For students who prefer to keep their options open with REA, Yale’s early round provides a meaningful but smaller advantage.
Cornell’s Early Decision acceptance rates vary significantly by undergraduate college. For recent admissions cycles, estimated ED rates by college are: College of Agriculture and Life Sciences (CALS) approximately 8-12%, School of Industrial and Labor Relations (ILR) approximately 8-12%, College of Human Ecology approximately 9-13%, School of Hotel Administration (SHA) approximately 10-15%, College of Arts and Sciences approximately 6-9%, College of Engineering approximately 6-9%, and College of Architecture, Art, and Planning (AAP) approximately 8-12%. Cornell’s overall ED rate of 18-23% is the highest among all Ivy League schools. New York State residents applying to Cornell’s three statutory colleges (CALS, ILR, and Human Ecology) benefit from in-state tuition and historically higher acceptance rates, making these among the most accessible pathways into any Ivy League school.
Ivy League waitlist acceptance rates vary dramatically by school. Cornell and Columbia are the most generous, with waitlist admit rates of approximately 4-10% and 5-12% respectively among students who accept their waitlist spot. Cornell typically admits 150-400 students from its waitlist each year, and Columbia admits 100-300. Penn and Brown fall in the middle range at 3-10% and 3-8%. Dartmouth admits fewer students from its waitlist, around 25-100 per year. Yale, Harvard, and Princeton are the least generous – Harvard and Yale admit 0-75 and 0-50 students respectively in most years, and Princeton frequently admits zero students from the waitlist. For students building a strategic school list, schools with active waitlists like Cornell and Columbia provide a meaningful second-chance pathway that Princeton and Harvard simply do not offer.
Five of the eight Ivy League schools are need-blind for international students: Harvard, Princeton, Yale, Columbia, and Dartmouth. This means these schools do not consider an international applicant’s ability to pay when making admissions decisions. The remaining three Ivies – Brown, Penn, and Cornell – are need-aware for international applicants, meaning your financial need can factor into whether you are admitted. For international students who require significant financial aid, applying to need-aware schools is statistically riskier. All eight Ivies meet 100% of demonstrated financial need for admitted students, but the distinction between need-blind and need-aware admissions is critical for international applicants building their school lists.
Five Ivy League schools offer binding Early Decision (ED): Cornell, Dartmouth, Brown, Penn, and Columbia. With ED, you commit to attending if admitted, and the acceptance rate advantage is substantial – typically two to four times higher than Regular Decision rates. Three Ivies offer non-binding Restrictive Early Action (REA): Harvard, Princeton, and Yale. With REA, you receive an early decision but are not obligated to attend, though you generally cannot apply early to other private schools. The ED advantage is larger because it signals stronger demonstrated interest – ED rates at Cornell can reach 18-23%, while REA rates at Harvard are approximately 7-9%. For students who have a clear first-choice Ivy, binding ED at schools like Cornell, Dartmouth, or Brown provides the most significant statistical boost to admission odds.
For the Class of 2030, the estimated total number of admits varies significantly across the Ivy League. Cornell admits the most at approximately 5,500-6,000 students from roughly 80,000 applications. Penn admits approximately 3,300-3,600 from about 78,000 applications. Columbia admits around 2,400-2,600 from approximately 57,000 applications. Brown admits approximately 2,400-2,500 from about 51,000 applications. Yale admits roughly 2,200-2,300 from approximately 52,000 applications. Harvard admits around 2,000-2,100 from about 57,000 applications. Princeton admits approximately 1,700-1,900 from around 40,000 applications. Dartmouth admits the fewest at approximately 1,600-1,700 from about 30,000 applications. Cornell’s significantly larger admit pool – nearly three times the size of Dartmouth’s or Princeton’s – is one reason it is statistically the most accessible Ivy League school.
